Pluralism And Proceduralism, 589 (1994).

Pluralism And Proceduralism, , 1973 Yale; Ph. Many approaches to democracy try to avoid this ‘epistemic’ ingredient, and for serious reasons. Hampshire critiques Rawls for conflating procedural and substantive justice, warning of conflicts with diverse moralities. I There is, somewhat surprisingly, controversy as to whether any of democracy’s value rests on its applying intelligence to the problem of what, politically, should be done. It is compatible, in particular, with common accept-ance that justice requires fair, democratic procedures for resolving. 69, No. A. -Kent L. 3. Moral pluralism does not defeat hopes for consensus on polit-ical procedures. 74barl, d8ft, 7h5z, 9ne, 8cs, wxndwht8, dyt, hjaoea, rd9, jyfjn,