Chances Of Acceptance After Minor Revision, The notification says, "the article is rejected even if it requires minor edits.
- Chances Of Acceptance After Minor Revision, Sep 29, 2014 · Instances of this decision are also rather rare. Jan 14, 2020 · There are many chances of acceptance of research article if it has passed editorial assessment and the article is sent for peer review. Minor revision means most likely your article will be accepted, but it's not a guarantee. However, it means that there are serious issues to be addressed. Jun 5, 2025 · Since minor revisions do not necessitate a fundamental restructuring of the article, they are generally reviewed only by the editor rather than external reviewers. Here is a candid breakdown of what each status means and how to secure your publication slot. Otherwise, this revised version is sent back to the original reviewers, who assess whether the authors have addressed the original comments appropriately and potentially pick up any new issues. Compare major vs minor revision decisions by scope, acceptance status, and re-review, then interpret the journal letter before revising your manuscript. Detailed below are the stages of peer review after article submission. Jan 14, 2020 · After review you may get two options major or minor revision. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. " I have revised and resubmitted the paper more than three times now. Apr 18, 2025 · Common reasons for a ‘minor revision’ decision A reviewer may request ‘minor revisions’ when only a few changes are required prior to acceptance. Minor revision Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. Authors who receive minor revision requests have a high likelihood of acceptance if they carefully implement the suggested changes. Your accepted article will now be passed to our production department. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Mar 6, 2026 · The workload, timeline, and statistical chances of final acceptance vary dramatically depending on whether you received a Minor Revision or a Major Revision. Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision All article submissions undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. Getting through the second round with a major revision or better gets you to about an 80% chance of acceptance. All you can do is do the requested revisions the best you can, and hope that it satisfies the editor and the reviewers. Oct 14, 2021 · If the revisions are very minor and the response appropriate, the editor might make a decision immediately. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. . Jun 30, 2024 · Generally, minor revisions lead to accepted papers, but not always. Does a minor revision after a major revision lead to acceptance ? It seems likely to me that the paper will be accepted. Minor revisions typically address: May 2, 2018 · I got minor revision in the first round of review. Oct 13, 2020 · After the first review, it came back for a major revision. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. This generally means that the manuscript needs some refinement, rather than a whole reconstruction. Your paper could absolutely still be rejected at this stage. My paper in IEEE Access keeps getting rejected for the third time with an option for resubmission (every time, one reviewer accepts and the other reviewer rejects with a request for an update before resubmission). The notification says, "the article is rejected even if it requires minor edits. I submitted after the revision and received a reply stating that my paper could be accepted after a minor revision (provided the reviewer's queries are addressed). One reviewer's comment was for acceptance, while the other reviewer wanted clarification about the novelty of the results. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. The problem is that every time I We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. These changes can usually be made quite quickly and it is unlikely we will need to send your revised article back to the reviewers. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 20%, which is comparable to other IEEE journals. I agree that there is a high chance of acceptance if the editor asks for major revision. I re-submitted the paper after incorpo As a very general rule of thumb, first round major revision is 50/50 in terms of eventually being accepted. But of course it is not definite until they make their decision and notify you. attu, hcxg, og9, 2rtf, kty, zv1l, rdpkhm, ko8ct, qkd, 0amkc,